| EPDWP January 2010 meeting |
| User Content | |||
| Written by Equity Pole Dancers | |||
|
Equity Pole Dancers’ Working Party
and Amber-Rosia, Louise Grainger (Equity’s marketing manager – for item 2 only)
and Emma had been working with a designer to produce this. He had been given a brief to produce something for this national event which would work on posters, banners and other materials and would work alongside the Equity logo. He was asked for something that was not too glamorous or too ‘fitness’. Emma had brought along about 25 initial designs for the working party to look at. These were reduced to a shortlist of 5. It was agreed that these would be circulated to other working party members for their comments by 29th January 2010. When Louise Grainger was in attendance she expressed preference for those logos which didn’t depict a female figure and particularly those contained in a circle as they work well on badges and stamps etc. Emma had also written some other documents for inclusion in a pack such as an example press release and a draft email that would go out to the schools. These would also be circulated to the other working party members for feedback.
and the email-shot would go out at the beginning of March, from the email group on Kate’s database. There would also be a Facebook / website page set up to list participating schools as they signed up. It was clarified that schools would not be charged for the packs. Replies from schools would be sent to the email account that had been set up and would need to be collated. Emma would organise Jonathon to submit an invoice for his work to Equity.
Magazine. This was the only magazine for the industry but it was thought it did not have the right image for where the working party wanted the industry to be. 3. Equity Campaign on Entertainment Licensing update. Michael Day reported that following the demonstration some progress was being made with government on the licensing exemption for small venues. There was currently a consultation on this to which Equity will make a submission. Following this it is hoped that a legislative reform order, which needs all party backing, can be made in time to make changes before a general election later this year. Equity and the Musicians' Union still wanted an exemption for venues of up to 200 capacity but the offer had only been for those of 100 or less.
mainly resolved except that the wording of the licensing policy had to be agreed. Currently burlesque entertainment was not being stopped from going ahead.
membership recruitment were discussed. The following had previously been mentioned:
final was thought to be in November.
Taylor and held in Surrey
were discussed. Generally these were about the copying of others’ choreography and use of music. It was apparent that this was a common problem and it was not clear where ‘being inspired’ by someone ended and plagiarism started. It was often the case that someone would use the same music as someone else and possibly similar costuming but not use the same moves. Also in burlesque it was often the case that a costume change would take place during an act, for example, from a secretary to Superwoman to the music of ‘Nine to Five’. This could be done in different ways and depending on the circumstances, could be a breach of one’s copyright but equally may not be. One working party member was actually named, without her consent, as being the inspiration for another’s performance. This could be a breach of ‘moral rights’ as individuals have the right not to be associated with something they are not involved in. Although this could have been actioned it had not been. It was also thought that this could give welcome publicity to the artist who had been the inspiration.
Undressed’ which had allegedly been a history of burlesque but had barely mentioned Dita Von Teese.
noted, however, that the availability of Equity’s meeting rooms was currently in question.
|